
BBC's "Sherlock" Series
- BlessedCheesemaker
- I'm a teapot
- Posts: 437
- Joined: November 2011
- Location: Western Pennsylvania
- Gender:
You may have already seen this but here is Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch's video for the Sherlock panel at ComicCon. Cumberbatch even explains how he survived the fall 


Awesome signiture and avatar by snubs
Check out my shop on Crestwood Avenue! Want to know more about me? Ask me a question!
- Amethystic
- Random Rebel
- Posts: 13261
- Joined: April 2008
- Location: Somewhere between this world and the planet Xoltac.
I want to know how or if the cabbage factors into his survival.
But yeah, the second monkey does explain a lot.
But yeah, the second monkey does explain a lot.

- Wooton Z. Bassett
- OK
- Posts: 212
- Joined: October 2012
- Location: Odyssey
- Contact:
Watched the second episode. Not as good as episode 1, but it's getting very exciting.
I'm on the Soda Shop and Campbell County Message Boards.
Check out unofficialaioblog.blogspot.com/

Check out unofficialaioblog.blogspot.com/

But the cup of tea! that was definitely important wouldn't you say?Amethystic wrote:I knew it!! That thing with the second monkey confirms all my theories!

Till the end of the line.
- Amethystic
- Random Rebel
- Posts: 13261
- Joined: April 2008
- Location: Somewhere between this world and the planet Xoltac.
But that's why they had the big helicopter thing, right? Between that and the tea, it's so obvious what was going on the entire time.Shennifer wrote:But the cup of tea! that was definitely important wouldn't you say?Amethystic wrote:I knew it!! That thing with the second monkey confirms all my theories!

- Smaug the Dragon
- If posts were pigs...
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 2006
- Location: is brea liom m'áit dúchais
Aw man. The next episode has been totally spoiled for me. Now that I'll be expecting the monkeys, the surprise is ruined. 

Haven't seen the series, but I reeeeally want to because Cumberbatch is incredible.

Wow, I didn’t like The Reichenbach Fall at all. Don’t get me wrong, it was a very clever story - very clever - but not as a Sherlock Holmes tale. Reichenbach is only supposed to be Sherlock’s end, not his downfall.
So as for whether there was the anticipated ‘emotional flailing’, that would depend on what I was supposed to flail over.
If it was the story, not so much. There wasn’t room for flailing as Sherlock was methodically taken down bit by bit, because I wasn’t open to it to affect me. I was frozen in a reaction of ‘this isn’t right’ so instead of getting more and more involved as things kept spiraling downward I just got more and more upset.
But if it was just over the very endthen my emotions did indeed flail, to an extent. Not excessively, because I sort of figured it was coming, but more along the lines of trying and failing to figure out what had really happened back there.
I do have to say though, that while the overall episode was disgraceful, in my opinion, for a Sherlock Holmes story, the climax, the final deadlock between Sherlock and Moriarty, was actually an impressively well conceived retelling of the intent behind the original story.
Arthur Conan Doyle never intended to write a definitive end to the ongoing rivalry between Holmes and Moriarty. His vision was that neither could ever get an overpowering upper hand, they were perpetually locked in their struggle, symbolic of the eternal battle between good and evil. However his publisher insisted he come up with an ultimate end. Doyle therefore wrote the resolution to The Final Problem somewhat out of spite. While technically complying with the mandate, he still kept his own vision intact. Neither rival won out, they were both killed off. The struggle remained unresolved.
In that respect, this episode did get one thing right.That did impress me very much. I only wish the way they chose to lead up to it wasn’t so wrong.
So as for whether there was the anticipated ‘emotional flailing’, that would depend on what I was supposed to flail over.
If it was the story, not so much. There wasn’t room for flailing as Sherlock was methodically taken down bit by bit, because I wasn’t open to it to affect me. I was frozen in a reaction of ‘this isn’t right’ so instead of getting more and more involved as things kept spiraling downward I just got more and more upset.
But if it was just over the very end
I do have to say though, that while the overall episode was disgraceful, in my opinion, for a Sherlock Holmes story, the climax, the final deadlock between Sherlock and Moriarty, was actually an impressively well conceived retelling of the intent behind the original story.
Arthur Conan Doyle never intended to write a definitive end to the ongoing rivalry between Holmes and Moriarty. His vision was that neither could ever get an overpowering upper hand, they were perpetually locked in their struggle, symbolic of the eternal battle between good and evil. However his publisher insisted he come up with an ultimate end. Doyle therefore wrote the resolution to The Final Problem somewhat out of spite. While technically complying with the mandate, he still kept his own vision intact. Neither rival won out, they were both killed off. The struggle remained unresolved.
In that respect, this episode did get one thing right.
I'm sorry you were disappointed on the lead up to the end but I'm glad you didn't dislike all of it.
I was upset about how Moriarty was working to bring Sherlock down,
but at the end,
I haven't read the original Final Problem yet, so maybe when I do it'll change my opinion somewhat.
I was upset about how Moriarty was working to bring Sherlock down,
but at the end,

Till the end of the line.
Well yes of course, I 'flailed' over that because of the nature of the scene. He didn't have a choice, he had to play it that way. It was very tough. But that's my point. That scene never should have had to go that way in the first place, because the discrediting plot was out of line.Shennifer wrote:
I gather that it was different in the Final Problem.bookworm wrote:Well yes of course, I 'flailed' over that because of the nature of the scene. He didn't have a choice, he had to play it that way. It was very tough. But that's my point. That scene never should have had to go that way in the first place, because the discrediting plot was out of line.Shennifer wrote:
Did you like the how the rest of the episodes compared to their original predecessors? I think this is the only one you said you didn't like. And I'm curious as to your thoughts on the rest of them.
Last edited by Shennifer on Wed Jul 24, 2013 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Till the end of the line.
- Termite
- Bard of Silly Annoyance
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: June 2008
- Location: *running from Tate Realtors*
- Contact:


Love you always, SnC
"A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
But...BUTWAITWHAT?Termite wrote:AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH OHMIGOSHOHMIGOSHOHMIGOSH EVERYONE WATCH THIS! (spoilers. you have been warned.)

Till the end of the line.
- Musical Shutterbug
- Film Score Addict
- Posts: 7623
- Joined: February 2010
Guys, I love that we can come up with theories for the show 

*insert provocative quote here*
To quote tumblr, we are turning into Sherlock: deducing and analyzingMusical Shutterbug wrote:Guys, I love that we can come up with theories for the show


Till the end of the line.
- Termite
- Bard of Silly Annoyance
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: June 2008
- Location: *running from Tate Realtors*
- Contact:
Well, about what Moffat said....
Rule number one: Moffat lies. And he says so himself in the quote in the yellow box.
Rule number one: Moffat lies. And he says so himself in the quote in the yellow box.


Love you always, SnC
"A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
- Graces4you
- Love to love
- Posts: 1962
- Joined: June 2011
- Location: Somewhere in a Beautiful Valley That everyone ought a see.
November 24th is when Season 3 comes out!!! It cannot come fast enough. Catching fire 22nd, Dr. Who 23rd, Sherlock 24th. Thanksgiving break will be very very busy.
Only entirely.Shennifer wrote:I gather that it was different in the Final Problem.
In the book there is no plot to discredit Holmes, Moriarty simply wants to kill him. Sherlock escapes successive assassins until he finally meets up with Moriarty himself, they fight on a cliff, and both go over.
Indeed, while some of the past episodes I haven’t liked as much as others, this is the first I haven’t liked at all. As I said, it’s not an acceptable Holmes story, so it is impossible to compare to the others. I did say the story itself was extremely clever, so in style and plot it compared excellently; and if this were an episode in some generic detective series I would actually rank it near if not at the top. The story and development were exceptionally strong. But as a chapter in this series, unquestionably the worst. Simply shameful.Shennifer wrote:Did you like the how the rest of the episodes compared to their original predecessors? I think this is the only one you said you didn't like.
As Holmes stories? They were fine. Some, like Hounds, even great. I don’t care about them that way really, because they’re just passing cases, you can take or leave them. If they change some ideas to put their own spin on it, that’s up to them. But The Final Problem is a cornerstone story, an extreme liberty like destroying Sherlock Holmes’ reputation is totally out of line.Shennifer wrote:And I'm curious as to your thoughts on the rest of them.