Special Treat

EugeneFan · Post by **EugeneFan** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:39 pm

That's right! The first new interview for quite some time has just been added to Eugene Forever. Ms. Kathy Buchanan has kindly answered several questions about AIO and her job there. I hope you enjoy reading it

.

Jonathan · Post by **Jonathan** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:40 pm

Yay! Thanks for posting that; the interviews are a great addition to your site^_^

ajamj · Post by **ajamj** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:48 pm

That was great, Eugene Fan! Thanks for the link!

Jonathan · Post by **Jonathan** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:31 pm

Some of you may be wondering why this thread temporarily disappeard; it's b/c a spoiler about an upcoming storyline was contained in the interview, and I hid this thread until the mistake was fixed on EugeneFan's website.

I haven't heard from Nathan Hoobler directly, but I am 99% positive the team doesn't want this info publicly known yet, and this is why I did what I did.

I am quite certain around 10 of you saw this, and since I have no way (that I know of) of knowing who saw and read that info, I have to publicly post this request:

If you were one of those who read and saw the spoiler Please do not comment on it or tell anyone this information. Thanks for your cooperation.

Nathan Hoobler will be contaced about this to double-check all this with him in the meantime. And sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused

STRYPER · Post by **STRYPER** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:34 pm

Jonathan wrote:I haven't heard from Nathan Hoobler directly, but I am 99% positive the team doesn't want this info publicly known yet, and this is why I did what I did.

Well it was Kathy's fault, she said it

COWBOY OF TEXAS · Post by **COWBOY OF TEXAS** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:48 pm

Bad Kathy.

You're a silly goose.

-Cowboy

Jonathan · Post by **Jonathan** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:54 pm

STRYPER wrote:
Jonathan wrote:I haven't heard from Nathan Hoobler directly, but I am 99% positive the team doesn't want this info publicly known yet, and this is why I did what I did.
Well it was Kathy's fault, she said it

I'm guessing that it was a honest oops. I was basing my info on the fact that we've been told that Mandy's weird behavior in a recent ep will be dealt with and Aria said that she was sworn to secrecy.

map · Post by **map** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:10 am

That was a great article, thanks for letting us know about it and giving us the chance to read it.

STRYPER · Post by **STRYPER** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:57 am

Hehe, I love the response to Mitch coming back

At least the writers feel the same way we do

Jonathan · Post by **Jonathan** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:46 am

STRYPER wrote:Hehe, I love the response to Mitch coming back

At least the writers feel the same way we do

I do agree; that was a classic response $\:D/$

J-man · Post by **J-man** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:54 am

This is so not fair. I'd give anything to find out what she said that was a spoiler..

STRYPER · Post by **STRYPER** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:33 pm

EDIT: Like J-man said below, please refrain from making posts that have only a smiley, or one to two words. Thank you - AIOFan11

J-man · Post by **J-man** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:11 pm

I love doing this..

STRYPER wrote:

The ToO rules wrote:1.2 - Short Replies (ie. one or two words)
Often times members may feel the need to post a reply that is only one or two words. This is not good message board etiquette and with money also being a factor on this board, short replies such as "yeah", "ditto", "don't care", "huh?", "nothing", "not interested", etc... are not encouraged. In some Hillingdale Haven threads it is acceptable, but in almost every other circumstance, please try to avoid short replies. As a general rule, if a thread deals with an issue or poses a question that you have little interest in or cannot answer a question with anything but "nothing" or "don't know", please do not respond.

Bennett · Post by **Bennett** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:13 pm

I knew my Odyssey Radar went off earlier today that something concerning Odyssey was opened for Fan Viewing.

I'm afraid that the interview with Kathy Buchanan wasn't as refreshing of a read compared with other interviews. She simply didn't give us enough teasers.

Her hint, however, was a little confusing. Anyone have any leads?

BC

STRYPER · Post by **STRYPER** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:01 pm

J-man wrote:I love doing this..
STRYPER wrote:

The ToO rules wrote:1.2 - Short Replies (ie. one or two words)
Often times members may feel the need to post a reply that is only one or two words. This is not good message board etiquette and with money also being a factor on this board, short replies such as "yeah", "I express similar sentiments to those posted by the user above me.", "don't care", "huh?", "nothing", "not interested", etc... are not encouraged. In some Hillingdale Haven threads it is acceptable, but in almost every other circumstance, please try to avoid short replies. As a general rule, if a thread deals with an issue or poses a question that you have little interest in or cannot answer a question with anything but "nothing" or "don't know", please do not respond.

So does Cowboy apparently

Kris Doyle · Post by **Kris Doyle** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:14 am

Jonathan wrote:I haven't heard from Nathan Hoobler directly, but I am 99% positive the team doesn't want this info publicly known yet, and this is why I did what I did.

Jonathan wrote:I'm guessing that it was a honest oops. I was basing my info on the fact that we've been told that Mandy's weird behavior in a recent ep will be dealt with and Aria said that she was sworn to secrecy.

So this is about Mandy? Man, I wish I could've seen that article. *Dies from anticipation of next season.

*

Laurie · Post by **Laurie** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:11 am

I jsut read the interview and it was great!! Thanks EugeneFan!! I, like everyone who did not see the spoiler, am wishing that I had seen it. I will now be going crazy waiting for next season.

Post by **Catspaw** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:25 am

I enjoyed the interview very much - thanks for letting us know about it, Eugenefan! $\:D/$

I kind of wish that I had seen the spoiler, but I'm kind of glad that I didn't. I like to know stuff, but I also want to be surprised. So I guess it's kind of good that I didn't see the spoiler - I'll have to exercise some pateince, I guess.

STRYPER · Post by **STRYPER** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:29 pm

Catspaw wrote:I kind of wish that I had seen the spoiler, but I'm kind of glad that I didn't. I like to know stuff, but I also want to be surprised.

Yeah I like to be surprised too

Oh why did I EVER read the spoiler

Bennett · Post by **Bennett** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:04 pm

Catspaw wrote: I kind of wish that I had seen the spoiler, but I'm kind of glad that I didn't. I like to know stuff, but I also want to be surprised. So I guess it's kind of good that I didn't see the spoiler - I'll have to exercise some pateince, I guess.

I feel the same way.

However perhaps we shouldn't get too excited. Afterall, we may be dissapointed in the end if we begin to imagine it's greater then it really is.

Perhaps Mandy stubbed her toe. And it bled--a lot.

BC