And "The Republic"...
I think people should decide for themselves whether they want to read something or not, and if you didn't like something because you had to read it for school, maybe you shouldn't consider your opinion of the work to be accurate.
Sorry to be all elitist or whatever, but I'm just tired of people acting like they know everything and calling every classic boring and bad...And the fact is most of you loved The Hunger Games and thought they were the best thing ever. lol, if we judged the Bible to the same standard we judged classic literature, everyone would hate it.
He's not lucky; he understands what the purpose of reading is and has probably read to a far wider extent than anyone else in this thread.Petrichor wrote:You are insanely lucky, then. I would think just about everyone has a couple books that they regret wasting their time on. For instance, I can't believe I blew two perfectly good hours of my life reading The Princess Diaries.Caswin wrote:Actually, I have trouble thinking of any book that I read in its entirety and didn't think I was better off for having read it.

edit: also, someone mentioned Moby Dick, and I'm sure others will agree. To that I can only say: you do understand there is more to writing than getting an action-packed story across in as few words as possible? More and more I think readers simply don't care to put thought or effort into their reading.