Alright. I will hand it to you here. Both of these episodes are a bit lame, but, "Whit's flop"... is the first Odyssey episode. Give em a break.
I did, hence "I don't think they're at the level we're aiming for".
I could have said it was the worst episode ever... that would be much more extreme than what I really said, and ironically, it would much more in line with what some people really think. There are some reviewers that really do trash episodes like Whit's Flop, for no particular reason -- I guess because it isn't funny enough to get a high score on their silly-o-meter, and because it isn't deep enough to be a serious story that "should be reviewed highly" (like, say, "The Time Has Come", or "Karen"), which people know they ought to give props to even if they don't personally like it.
"Gifts for Madge and Guy" is silly, yes. But is there anything wrong with that?
Well, not necessarily, but as I mentioned before, I think a well-done, serious take on something can be more powerful, and in a way more enjoyable than a silly one. That said, a lot of the time, when I say that something is "silly", that's just a statement in itself -- it doesn't mean that it's a bad episode, it just means that it has elements that I think are slightly distasteful, from a serious, quality-driven viewpoint. They're episodes that wouldn't happen in real life.
Yes. "The Day Independence Came" is a little lame... but I still like it.
That's fine... but, I, personally, don't like it as much as others do.
Alright.. I may be slightly biased on this one because this is the only album I had growing up......
I'd like to note that this was also one of the few albums I had when I was a kid, too.
But, "A Single Vote" is amazing. It's a grandfatherly way of telling a story to a confused teen.
Well, I have no issue with the quality of the story-telling. It's clearly the best part of the episode.
Aside from the fact that Horace gets on my nerves (which is a personal opinion, and isn't really a reason to rate the episode down), the thing about this episode is that it's a re-telling of the "one vote" urban legend, which, as
Snopes can tell you, just doesn't happen to be true. It strikes me as like an Odyssey version of the columns that ladies like Ann Landers write up on their spaces every time a vaguely patriotic date or event comes around.
"Samuel... was an old guy. The voice was perfect for that."
The problem that I have with its portrayal of Samuel is that, while I don't know if it's necessarily disrespectful, I don't think it takes him as seriously as it should. A proper way to regard one of the OT prophets, I think, is showcased in "Elijah", or "Moses, the Passover". He was one of the greatest leaders the children of Israel had ever had, a universally respected judge in the land. God once told Jeremiah that He would not forgive Judah for their transgressions "even if Moses
and Samuel came before Me". That statement implies that Samuel is near par with Moses as a mediator for Israel. We're not talking about just some guy here; this is one of the greatest leaders Israel has ever known. I think it's appropriate to give him that kind of respect. You would presumably be upset if there was an episode that put a pastor in a consistently silly or ridiculous light; I think Samuel should qualify the same way.
I'll agree. But... what does this have to do with Stupid episodes?
If we're reviewing each and every album, one at a time, then obviously it makes sense to criticize aspects of the albums on the whole too while we're at it.
May I just say... I LOVE this episode. And Jack and Robyn MAKE that episode.
I like the episode too, but mostly I like the parts with Elijah, Ahab, et al. in them. I would say that it is actually Parley Baer's very strong performance as Elijah that makes the episode, not anything the modern characters did... with the exception of one scene. The scene with Robyn and Jezebel, where Robyn refuses to bow to the idol, is very memorable, and the one part of the story that really uses the modern characters well.
O.o Where did you get that Curt is evil?
I didn't get the idea that he's evil, I got the idea that the *writers* thought he's evil. There is a very important difference there.
Where did I get that from? Chris's ongoing commentary about Curt at the beginning and end of every episode. She barely has as much as a single positive word to say about him, and that struck me as being the writing staff's perspective on him.
But, how would you like it if you opened up a Kid's school newspaper, and you saw HORRIBLE grammer/spelling?
That's just the point, though -- where are they going to learn how to write, if not in the school newspaper?
Obviously writers at that age are going to have issues. That's the whole point of having something like that to begin with, to give children journalistic experience, to refine their talents and teach them what it takes. If you only pick out the ones who are good to start with, then what you're in effect doing is saying, "We can't be bothered to teach anyone anything; only people like Lucy, who inherited her skill from her journalist father, should be allowed to write". That just doesn't seem right.
....... Curt... Is messed up because of his alcoholic father. plus... he's just mischievous/wants to get out of school. what's your problem with him anyway?
I've already explained this, but I'll do it again just to make sure it's clear.
I don't have a problem with Curt. But the writers seemed to, as they seemed to imply through Chris's dialogue. When Curt did something right (in his mayoral dream sequence, in "Mayor for a Day", where he effectively solved a problem), the follow-up was, paraphrased, "Well, look at him, he learned his lesson,
this time. Let's see if that lasts. Heh heh." The focus is always on "teaching him a lesson", as though he's got it coming.
o.o What's unlikeable about Esther and Ben? I mean really?
Esther is everything that people hate about Emily Jones. She's overbearing, and a bit rude.
Ben, on the other hand, is being blatantly portrayed as a slow character, and whenever he speaks, someone usually tries to get him to shut up as quickly as possible.
Once again... what's wrong with Silliness?
Once again, I think it can detract from writing quality, the ability for people to relate to the situations therein, and the power of any particular episode.
"Selpurcs"... would have to be one of my favorite episodes. I see this episode as a cute, fairly realistic/cutely childish type of episode. This is a show for 8-12 year olds. none of them are gonna be thinking this deeply into the show.
That's why I said that I "look forward to it". I enjoy it, but that doesn't mean that it's necessarily a well-written episode, or that it's above and beyond all criticism.
I believe there *are* episodes that are mostly above criticism -- like Clara, Karen, etc. -- but that they are few and far between, and merely being enjoyable alone (like "Suspicious Minds") isn't enough to shield them from review.
Plus, what were they supposed to do with Jimmy while his voice changed. I mean really. Come on
Write an episode that isn't unrealistic?
Don't get me wrong -- as I tried to say the first time around, I think this is actually mostly a decent episode. That said, there are aspects of it that greatly bring it down.
plus he gets this disappointment of not being able to play his role he's been playing for years. -.-
Maybe being a girl, you wouldn't necessarily relate to this, but that isn't normal... in this specific case.
The realistic response to a male being forced to play Juliet is depicted in the episode where it first happens -- where Jimmy is obviously disgusted with the idea (though, somewhat unrealistically, not to the point where he wouldn't do it).
Jimmy playing Juliet would be like having a boy play Mary in a Christmas pageant... and if you don't see anything unusual about that, well, there's nothing more I can do to try to explain this to you. Just trust me on this, 'kay? I'm a male; I understand this aspect of the story.
I know I'm gonna wear this out.. but... What. In. The. World. Is wrong with silly?!
Bob wrote:Once again, I think it can detract from writing quality, the ability for people to relate to the situations therein, and the power of any particular episode.
What do you think the writers have against curt?
I don't know exactly what they seemed to have against him. I'd like to know, though.
Every time an episode called for a "bad" character, they threw Curt in. Need a practical joker? Curt. Want an episode that has a bad kid that believes stealing is okay? Go ahead and use Curt, that's okay.
Sometimes this even happens when he's trying to do the right thing, like in "Mayor for a Day" -- but his effort there just wasn't good enough, and still gets criticized at the end of the episode.
Whit was just trying to help. Ya know.. give him a reality check?
I understand the intent, but the fact is that these two situations aren't directly comparable, when it comes down to real politics.
........... no comment. nothing I have to say would be nice to say here.
I'm not afraid of any negative comments you have to make regarding what I've said. Don't get the impression that I condone what Curt did in the episode; it was clearly wrong. The fact is, though, that I think the writers chose the wrong way to try to get him back for it.
Thank you. FINALLY an episode you give a positive rating.
Well, considering that this is a list of "stupidest episodes", it wouldn't really make sense for me to say: "Well, this episode is bad... now let me list off the other eleven in the album that aren't."
As it is, I did eventually end up doing just about that.
-sigh- As if picking on Curt wasn't bad enough for you... now you pick on OT action news.
Is it because these episodes are old, that they're above criticism? I don't get it; when someone rips into every point they can think of to dislike one of the new albums, like #51 or #52, everyone likes it. This just seems kinda inconsistent to me.
I'll admit.. they're DEFINITELY not my favorite episodes.. but they're a cute way of getting the message across.
It so happens that I think it could've been done more effectively if it didn't try to be cute.
Yeah.. I've never really seen where they bash on Charles in this Episode.
Well, for starters, we can start with the class jeering at him every chance they get, and Mrs. Hodges (who, coincidentally, happens to be a special ed teacher) being his only base of support in the school.
And the part where Eugene goes on a tirade. And the
writers themselves calling him by the same nickname as his "friends", in Chris's dialogue.
People hate Danny? :O Since when?
I'm sorry, but just about everyone hates Danny...

I'm one of the few people who tries to give him a little bit of leeway, in fact. Just do a search on "Danny Schmidt" and you'll see plenty of negative feedback about him.
Way to pick on my second favorite episode. -.-
I didn't just wake up one morning and say, "I think I'm going to go annoy someone I don't know online, 'cuz that sounds like a fun thing to do... lemme see, who should I pick? I know, how about Candy?" I'm not trying to single you out here... if you like it and I don't, that's fine, but I'm trying to explain why I don't like it. It shouldn't be about me vs. you; the post was about criticizing the parts of the episode I think are weak -- in a topic where everyone else is doing the same thing.
Isaac is an anti hero? Really? That's funny... I thought he was pretty heroic. He tried to stop the bullies...
Let's look at the methods he used, though, and the way he acted at the time.
He decided to try to find out what Charles was talking to Nicholas and Rusty about. To do this, instead of reasoning with him all the way, or maybe talking to Charles' mother (since he had good evidence Charles probably cheated on a test), or something, he decided to just catch up to him, outside, and when Charles refused to tell, tortured him (okay, tickling doesn't exactly count as "high torture", but the bad guys did it too). We get the impression that this is supposed to be okay, because the ends justify the means.
Isn't that exactly the sort of attitude that Emily Jones has/had? And didn't the Odyssey team directly condemn that in "Square One"? What makes this different? Just because it's Isaac, who came along earlier in the series, doesn't mean it's okay.
-sigh- "Bad Hair Day" is good. It shows why you shouldn't try to solve things by yourself.. and not to judge things but what they appear to be. and forgiveness. soo... remind me again... why is this bad?
The point isn't the message, the point is how well they implemented it, and I would say "not well". I believe another episode could have done this better... and they *did* carry two of those points off better, with the court episode (where the suspect is found "Not guilty" thanks to Eugene), and with Richard Maxwell and the man who indirectly helped Timothy Riley's death (on the topic of forgiveness).
Besides, neither Rodney nor any of his friends/the people he dragged along get punished for what they did, even though it could qualify as criminal action, especially in today's society. Not only that, but if I remember right, that aspect is never even brought into the equation -- Rodney's gang is regarded as being like a force of nature, who are beyond direct condemnation or opposition. The issue isn't what they did, it's what Henry did (or in this case, didn't do). That seems slightly off.
How else are they supposed to tell "St. Paul"? Just a regular story? Yeah. That's definitely gonna keep a kid's attention these days.
By "these days", you imply something changed at some point.
I don't believe that to be the case. If something held a kid's attention at one point, then, logically, if it's well-done, it should work just as well on children of the future. I believe "The W.E." made this same point -- not all things have to change.
Besides, how did Sam and Rodney add anything to the story? The most I saw they did was tag along and either ask questions or make snarky remarks (in the case of Rodney)...
They're Mulligan Episodes. What're ya gonna do?
Point out that there were things that could have been done better, of course.
1. Volleyball... is not my favorite sport. They focused on it almost too much imho...
Well, volleyball *is* one of my favorite sports, so I have no objection with it.
That said, it might have been more consistent to go with the great tradition of Odyssey and use baseball instead (since that appears in every other Odyssey sports episode)... I would have personally liked a hockey episode myself, but I guess the AIO team is too far down south for that.
2. Poor loser. Is just great.

It's an enjoyable episode, and I like listening to it, but it isn't perfect, and I'm trying to keep that in perspective.
I don't hate this album... who hates this album? o.O
Do a search on "Virtual Realities" or "Album 33", and find out.
Album 36: Danger Signals: Two words: "Snow Day".
SERIOUSLY?!
Seriously.
-sigh- Obviously... you've never tried to diet.
What does my dieting have to do with whether some aspects of the episode are realistic or not? For that matter, what does it being funny have to do with that, or the quality of the episode?
For instance, is the deception Bernard employs in the episode realistic, for a mature Christian of his stature? Of course it isn't. Yet it still shows up there.
Kids are ADD these days (most... not all) They enjoy Several plotlines. (i know I do)
Maybe so, but three is too many -- especially when most of them are pretty weak. Grady's debut is largely pointless fluff... the episode alludes to a lot of deeper themes, like with Mark coming home from the war, with one of his friends dead (a very traumatic, life-changing experience that was barely brushed on here)... Mr. Mulligan not taking a profitable job on Nick's behalf... and with Tamika giving up one of her favorite possessions... but it barely stops to touch on any of them.
All of these could have been great, character-development episodes, even if they did all have about the same theme, but instead they tried to rush through all of them, and it just didn't work for me.
Am I the only person here that actually likes this episode? O.O
Yes.
My parents lived 20 minutes away from each other... and they ended up going to bible school across the country...and meeting there.
The thing is that Bible School is inevitably going to attract a lot of the same sorts of people. I've gone to several state conventions, and I've seen a lot of the same people at each one. I imagine that's going to happen for a lot of highly-regarded institutions or meetings that cater to specific groups like that.
I know I'm repeating myself... but seriously? You keep using "silly". Do you have something wrong with a non-dramatic episode for once?
Bob wrote:Once again, I think it can detract from writing quality, the ability for people to relate to the situations therein, and the power of any particular episode.
Not all the episodes I like are "dramatic". You don't hear me talking about, say, "Back to School", which also happens to include a lot of (what some people would say is silly) material thrown in.
The difference is that that isn't the whole episode, and furthermore, no plot points hinge on Crazy Eddie's driving; it's just a natural elaboration of Leslie's character, and it doesn't interfere with any of the things the episode tries to tell us in the end.
Umm... this never struck me as a bad episode.
It strikes me as having problems in a lot of ways.
If my opinion isn't good enough in itself, though, do a search and you'll see that other people have some of the same complaints.
This was a good episode that brought them back to a kiddish level. Finally.
This line is what makes me think we're on two completely different pages, and may never see eye to eye on this.
I'm looking at these episodes from the angle of character development. "Bringing them *back*" to something, obviously, undoes all of that, and basically says, "All those episodes where Connie and Eugene were mature? Forget 'em. We're going back to the late '80s/early '90s."
Furthermore, it portrays that immature way as something that, at the least, should be expected of mature adults, when I don't think that is at all how it should be -- or is.
And "Prequels of Love" is another one of my favorites. So anything I say to argue is too mean to type out.
One more time, I didn't pick it as a bad episode specifically to spite you -- I said what I said because I believe it to be true of that episode, at least using the criteria that I'm using.