I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on that point.Sputnik wrote:I love Aslan because of who his is supposed to portray. LoTR could never mean so much.
Admittedly, The Chronicles of Narnia has more overt Biblical allusions, but that's not to say The Lord of the Rings isn't without its full share of implications and Biblical parallels. Tolkien's work, although not as explicitly Christian as Lewis', does reflect God's own creation. Tolkien said about the story of salvation that it is the "story of a larger kind which embraces all the essence of fairy-stories . . . [the story in which] the desire and aspiration of sub-creation has been raised to the fulfillment of Creation . . . this story [Eucatastrophe] is supreme; and it is true. Art has been verified. God is the Lord of angels, and of men—and of elves. Legend and History have met and fused." Having taken full year courses on both CoN and LoTR, I've seen many great things in both.
Tolkien even admitted to infusing his beliefs into LoTR. In a letter written to Robert Murray (1963), Tolkien wrote, "LOTR is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision . . . The religious element is absorbed into the story . . . chiefly grateful for having been brought up (since I was eight) in a Faith that has nourished me and taught me all the little that I know; and that I owe to my mother, who clung to her conversion and died young, largely through the hardships of poverty resulting from it."
Yes, I'm an LoTR supporter.
All that being said, I still hold CoN in the highest of regard. If it weren't for Lewis, I would not have gotten into literature as much as I have. That and my parents wanted me to take a literature course.
Ultimately, we see a fair share of Biblical truths embedded within the fantasy lands of both Narnia and Middle Earth.