The Town of Odyssey

Oh I see... so the second picture was removed because it implied bisexuality. Or were the camo pants somehow see through ? And my legs showing in the 'before' picture must be completely acceptable due to the absence of evil tattoos and the presence of a sweet, submissive smile- because all women are called to be sweet, submissive and tattoo less by almighty god . I think I get it now....

Not.

*Shuffles all children under the age of ten out the door and follows himself*

I don't think anyone here has a big problem with you wearing pants, having tattoos, or not having a "sweet, submissive smile." Others here have posted pictures of all three of those things, sometimes together. Like Catspaw said, the only issue was that the first picture might not have been appropriate for younger kids.

We're not all fundamentalist, unsocialized, legalistic farmers here, you know.

Christian A. wrote: We're not all fundamentalist, unsocialized, legalistic farmers here, you know.

Speak for yourself...

Christian A. wrote: We're not all fundamentalist, unsocialized, legalistic farmers here, you know.

I agree with that.

. . .

We aren't?

>.>

Christian A. wrote:I don't think anyone here has a big problem with you wearing pants, having tattoos, or not having a "sweet, submissive smile." Others here have posted pictures of all three of those things, sometimes together. Like Catspaw said, the only issue was that the first picture might not have been appropriate for younger kids.

We're not all fundamentalist, unsocialized, legalistic farmers here, you know.

If any young kids are mentally scarred by seeing a girl in a strapless, red dress... they need to go see a psychiatrist because there are greater issues there than the girl's dress . I wasn't exposed. You could simply see my shoulders and legs and anyone who steps foot into ANY public place has had the chance to see girls dressed far more scantily clad than I was in my dress. It's not my fault that my legs make up a good 80% of my height and when I wear dresses made for the average sized and proportioned woman (which is 5' 3''), my 5' 8'' self has a little more sticking out from under the fabric than usual. Still- NOTHING was showing. Despite popular opinion, I don't think showing pr0n to kiddies is acceptable, and never would have posted the picture here if anything was NOT left to the imagination. The second image... I won't even delve into that department. The reason it was removed is far too retarded to even be given recognition. To remove the photos stamps everyone who agrees with the decision as... fundamentalist, unsocialized, legalistic prudes. Maybe not farmers- I'm sure some of you serve in the church instead of feeding livestock .

NOW. Take 2.

All girly and modest:


Tomboy days:


Better? Good . Everyone can be happy and live happily ever after now =D!

What is this filth!?

I know.. you can still see my face . I'm sorry, next time I'll wear a burqa, I promise!

I am trying to find a way to report your avatar too, but I can't find the link.

I know right. You could just remove it, being Admin and all you don't need any reasons or justifications for your actions .

Crazy kids..

I told you things were going to get interesting.

here. have some blue.

Lovely picture, ique. =]

snubs wrote:Crazy kids..

Yes, yes- that's exactly what it is. I forgot, you're the only adult on here. My bad .

@Icky: Beautiful!

I do like to keep this topic active. =p

Beautiful, Snubs!

Ooh I like the angle, snubs! pretty.

Here's muah