Indeed. For many, the motu proprio will mark the end of the indult system, which you described. For many, this is an unacceptable compromse as an "indult" is similar if not synonymous with "apology". In other words, under the current schema, one must, in effect, plead apology in order to celebrate in the Tridentine rite.Joseph Schumpeter wrote:I've heard Fr. Joseph Fessio state that Pope Benedict XVI has in his desk the decree that will permit each Catholic church to decide of its own accord, without soliciting the permission of the diocese, whether or not to hold a Tridentine mass. Whether many individual churches would change their missals, I do not know; sadly, I doubt there's a large audience for it. For the sake of tradition, though, I hope the practice grows. (I had intended to attend a Tridentine mass with a number of friends this spring, but it never worked out. I shall have to do so at some point, however.)
Interestingly enough, though, interest seems high. Though it is difficult to locate a traditional services, the ones that still exist are quite heavily attended which, I would hope, attests at least in part to a desire to return to the old liturgy.
Finally, I appreciate the distinctions between the 'emerging church' and the modern charismatic movement as I was not aware of the finer points of distinction. Nevertheless, they do occupy, in some sense, the same "sphere" of modernism which I am confident we can agree has been troublesome for the church in recent years.